Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nika Radisic vs Paula Ormaechea Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Radisic vs Ormaechea analysis and find out who is favored!
Nika Radisic vs Paula Ormaechea Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Radisic 0 - 0 Ormaechea
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Radisic has won 44.34% of points on their second serve, while Ormaechea has won 45.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Radisic, in recent form, has won 54.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ormaechea has won 58.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.36% and 39.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Radisic has saved 44.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ormaechea has saved 49.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Radisic has won 59.74% of matches played (W/L 46/ 31), with Ormaechea winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Radisic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 166/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Ormaechea has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 362/ 202), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 23% (W/L 3/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Radisic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.74% of matches (W/L 46/ 31), where as Ormaechea has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Radisic has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.31 while Ormaechea has played against players with an average rank of 351.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Radisic has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ormaechea has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Radisic has converted 50.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ormaechea has converted 50.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
367
Rank
367
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
843
Rank
59
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
55% (177-142)
Career Total W/L
60% (416-282)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$403,418
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nika Radisic | Paula Ormaechea |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (30/31) | 46% (21/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (271/281) | 49% (198/208) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) | 42% (8/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:51 | 1:53:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.15 | 361.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1024/1651) | 63% (827/1315) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (567/1024) | 54% (449/827) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (278/627) | 46% (223/488) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (111/221) | 50% (80/159) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (793/1704) | 46% (607/1307) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (13/14) | 44% (8/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (8/0) |
Nika Radisic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Nika Radisic
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eszter Meri
Player
Nika Radisic
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
38 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Nika Radisic
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Daniela Vismane
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Alina Granwehr
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Nika Radisic
80%
(
65 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
45 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Jessica Pieri
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
98)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Lilli Tagger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Nika Radisic
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paula Ormaechea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Dinu
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Ormaechea
Player
Fiona Ganz
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
72 of
96)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Ormaechea
Player
Selena Janicijevic
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Paula Ormaechea
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
56%
(
73 of
130)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-0 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Paula Ormaechea
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Paula Ormaechea
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
39 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Ormaechea
Player
Eleonora Alvisi
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
45%
(
19 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
33 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Radisic Vs Ormaechea Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Radisic are available here and Ormaechea photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
